<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Associated Content cheapened SEO copywriting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/</link>
	<description>Drive more Web traffic. Boost your search engine rankings. Make more money. Online SEO copywriting training classes for freelance writers, small businesses and marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:22:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Copywriting &#124; No one engine should have all that power</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-35063</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Copywriting &#124; No one engine should have all that power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-35063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] search engines purchase &#8220;content mill&#8221; companies (I&#8217;m looking at you, Yahoo,) where writers are paid bottom-dollar&#8230;and the quality is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] search engines purchase &#8220;content mill&#8221; companies (I&#8217;m looking at you, Yahoo,) where writers are paid bottom-dollar&#8230;and the quality is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Copywriting &#124; SEO content marketing roundup, week ending July 28th</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-33987</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Copywriting &#124; SEO content marketing roundup, week ending July 28th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-33987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] may recall the recent buzz /controversy over content mills/farming?Â  Well, take at look at this:Â  Blekko may be in prime position to become the new search tool of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may recall the recent buzz /controversy over content mills/farming?Â  Well, take at look at this:Â  Blekko may be in prime position to become the new search tool of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Henneberry</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-33617</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Henneberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-33617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am unfortunately intimately familiar with paying copywriters for poor SEO copywriting and plastering it on clients websites (from a former job I held.)  

This process can work (from time to time) for SEO agencies that promise nothing but better rankings but it does nothing for every other metric that should be considered.  

Last time I checked traffic doesn&#039;t generate sales, conversions do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unfortunately intimately familiar with paying copywriters for poor SEO copywriting and plastering it on clients websites (from a former job I held.)  </p>
<p>This process can work (from time to time) for SEO agencies that promise nothing but better rankings but it does nothing for every other metric that should be considered.  </p>
<p>Last time I checked traffic doesn&#8217;t generate sales, conversions do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Copywriting &#124; SEO content marketing roundup, week ending July 14th</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-33415</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Copywriting &#124; SEO content marketing roundup, week ending July 14th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-33415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] content quality debate is far from over!Â  A completely different take on web content mills (â€œcontent farmingâ€), such [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] content quality debate is far from over!Â  A completely different take on web content mills (â€œcontent farmingâ€), such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Crest</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-33160</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Crest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-33160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Heather, 

for a number of things, like:

 1) Citing specific evidence backing up my largely prideful and intuitive decision to NOT write for Demand Media (or Suite 101, or ODesk, or Hub Pages, or...sadly ad infinitum...)

2) Reminding web owners -- ONCE AGAIN! -- that they indeed do get what they pay for.  If they&#039;re paying next to nothing for content kicked out on a production line that pays its mediocre writers sh#t wages, then that is PRECISELY what they are gonna get:  sh#t copy.

3) Putting Yahoo on Notice:  Yes, shame, shame, shame on you, Yahoo.  Bad juju, not good!  And yes, you really should know better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Heather, </p>
<p>for a number of things, like:</p>
<p> 1) Citing specific evidence backing up my largely prideful and intuitive decision to NOT write for Demand Media (or Suite 101, or ODesk, or Hub Pages, or&#8230;sadly ad infinitum&#8230;)</p>
<p>2) Reminding web owners &#8212; ONCE AGAIN! &#8212; that they indeed do get what they pay for.  If they&#8217;re paying next to nothing for content kicked out on a production line that pays its mediocre writers sh#t wages, then that is PRECISELY what they are gonna get:  sh#t copy.</p>
<p>3) Putting Yahoo on Notice:  Yes, shame, shame, shame on you, Yahoo.  Bad juju, not good!  And yes, you really should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-33153</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-33153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Derek - thanks for your first-hand account.

I totally understand how cheap content is big business - I do. Heck, that&#039;s why folks hire offshore companies (with disastrous results, naturally.) 

But for Yahoo - a search engine (and a company that has been near and dear to my heart since Inktomi days) to implicitly endorse the &quot;cheap copy&quot; mantra...well...that just &lt;em&gt;bugs &lt;/em&gt;me. They have the opportunity to raise the bar, set standards (like they&#039;re trying to do with their&lt;a href=&quot;http://styleguide.yahoo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Style Guide&lt;/a&gt;) and really help companies. 

Sad. So sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Derek &#8211; thanks for your first-hand account.</p>
<p>I totally understand how cheap content is big business &#8211; I do. Heck, that&#8217;s why folks hire offshore companies (with disastrous results, naturally.) </p>
<p>But for Yahoo &#8211; a search engine (and a company that has been near and dear to my heart since Inktomi days) to implicitly endorse the &#8220;cheap copy&#8221; mantra&#8230;well&#8230;that just <em>bugs </em>me. They have the opportunity to raise the bar, set standards (like they&#8217;re trying to do with their<a href="http://styleguide.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow"> Style Guide</a>) and really help companies. </p>
<p>Sad. So sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Cromwell</title>
		<link>http://www.seocopywriting.com/content-marketing/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-33147</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Cromwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-33147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually got my start writing for Associated Content several years ago, and I couldn&#039;t agree more that they have a &quot;write it fast and get it turned in&quot; mentality, especially for new writers.

You cited that the pay range goes from $2 to $15 per article.  That might be what they state, but I speak from experience (having over 60 articles on their site myself) that they pay as low as possible.  Even articles that I painstakingly edited over and over didn&#039;t fetch more than $9.

Their performance payments are where people find the most payout over the long term but that just makes the rush mentality even worse.  Once you&#039;re an &quot;approved&quot; content producer (you&#039;ve submitted more than 3 approved articles) you&#039;re able to publish for performance pay without your article being reviewed by editors.  That means that anyone can post anything - similar to the terrible piece you found on SEO copywriting.

I don&#039;t write for AC anymore, it&#039;s been a long time since I&#039;ve contributed anything but it continues to be a sweatshop for writers wanting to make money that can&#039;t or won&#039;t strike out on their own.

I used to argue with people about quality in the AC forums, and was frequently told that if I wanted better I should go somewhere else.  So I did - self-employment :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually got my start writing for Associated Content several years ago, and I couldn&#8217;t agree more that they have a &#8220;write it fast and get it turned in&#8221; mentality, especially for new writers.</p>
<p>You cited that the pay range goes from $2 to $15 per article.  That might be what they state, but I speak from experience (having over 60 articles on their site myself) that they pay as low as possible.  Even articles that I painstakingly edited over and over didn&#8217;t fetch more than $9.</p>
<p>Their performance payments are where people find the most payout over the long term but that just makes the rush mentality even worse.  Once you&#8217;re an &#8220;approved&#8221; content producer (you&#8217;ve submitted more than 3 approved articles) you&#8217;re able to publish for performance pay without your article being reviewed by editors.  That means that anyone can post anything &#8211; similar to the terrible piece you found on SEO copywriting.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t write for AC anymore, it&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve contributed anything but it continues to be a sweatshop for writers wanting to make money that can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t strike out on their own.</p>
<p>I used to argue with people about quality in the AC forums, and was frequently told that if I wanted better I should go somewhere else.  So I did &#8211; self-employment <img src='http://www.seocopywriting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
